Keepers of Bush Image Lift Stagecraft to New Heights
May 16, 2003 By ELISABETH BUMILLER
  New York Times
(some images below added by media educator Frank Baker; see more recent Bush photos  here )

http://www.thewashingtonnote.com/archives/Mission-accomplished.jpg


WASHINGTON, May 15 - George W. Bush's "Top Gun" landing on the deck of the carrier Abraham Lincoln will be remembered as one of the most audacious moments of presidential theater in American history. But it was only the latest example of how the Bush administration, going far beyond the foundations in stagecraft set by the Reagan White House, is using the powers of television and technology to promote a presidency like never before.

Officials of past Democratic and Republican administrations marvel at how the White House does not seem to miss an opportunity to showcase Mr. Bush in dramatic and perfectly lighted settings. It is all by design: the White House has stocked its communications operation with people from network television who have expertise in lighting, camera angles and the importance of backdrops.

On Tuesday, at a speech promoting his economic plan in Indianapolis, White House aides went so far as to ask people in the crowd behind Mr. Bush to take off their ties, WISH-TV in Indianapolis reported, so they would look more like the ordinary folk the president said would benefit from his tax cut.

"They understand the visual as well as anybody ever has," said Michael K. Deaver, Ronald Reagan's chief image maker. "They watched what we did, they watched the mistakes of Bush I, they watched how Clinton kind of stumbled into it, and
  they've taken it to an art form."

The White House efforts have been ambitious - and costly. For the prime-time television address that Mr. Bush delivered to the nation on the anniversary of the Sept. 11 attacks, the White House rented three barges of giant Musco lights, the kind used to illuminate sports stadiums and rock concerts, sent them across New York Harbor, tethered them in the water around the base of the Statue of Liberty and then blasted them upward to illuminate all 305 feet of America's symbol of freedom. It was the ultimate patriotic backdrop for Mr. Bush, who spoke from Ellis Island.

For a speech that Mr. Bush delivered last summer at Mount Rushmore, the White House positioned the best platform for television crews off to one side, not head on as other White Houses have done, so that the cameras caught Mr. Bush in profile, his face perfectly aligned with the four presidents carved in stone.

And on Monday, for remarks the president made promoting his tax cut plan near Albuquerque, the White House unfurled a backdrop that proclaimed its message of the day, "Helping Small Business," over and over. The type was too small to be read by most in the audience, but 
 just the right size for television viewers at home.


"I don't know who does it," Mr. Deaver said, "but somebody's got a good eye over there."

That somebody, White House officials and television executives say, is in fact three or four people. First among equals is Scott Sforza, a former ABC producer who was hired by the Bush campaign in Austin, Tex., and who now works for Dan Bartlett, the White House communications director. Mr. Sforza created the White House "message of the day" backdrops and helped design the $250,000 set at the United States Central Command forward headquarters in Doha, Qatar, during the Iraq war.

Mr. Sforza works closely with Bob DeServi, a former NBC cameraman whom the Bush White House hired after seeing his work in the 2000 campaign. Mr. DeServi, whose title is associate director of communications for production, is considered a master at lighting. "You want it, I'll heat it up and make a picture," he said early this week. Mr. DeServi helped produce one of Mr. Bush's largest events, a speech to a crowd in Revolution Square in Bucharest last November.

To stage the event, Mr. DeServi went so far as to rent Musco lights in Britain, which were then shipped across the English Channel and driven across Europe to Romania, where they lighted Mr. Bush and the giant stage across from the country's former Communist headquarters.

A third crucial player is Greg Jenkins, a former Fox News television producer in Washington who is now the director of presidential advance. Mr. Jenkins manages the small army of staff members and volunteers who move days ahead of Mr. Bush and his entourage to set up the staging of all White House events.

"We pay particular attention to not only what the president says but what the American people see," Mr. Bartlett said. "Americans are leading busy lives, and sometimes they don't have the opportunity to read a story or listen to an entire broadcast. But if they can have an instant understanding of what the president is talking about by seeing 60 seconds of television, you accomplish your goals as communicators. So we take it seriously."

The president's image makers, Mr. Bartlett said, work within a budget for White House travel and events allotted by Congress, which for fiscal 2003 was $3.7 million. He said he did not know the specific cost of staging Mr. Bush's Sept. 11 anniversary speech, or what the White House was charged for the lights. A spokeswoman at the headquarters of Musco Lighting in Oskaloosa, Iowa, said the company did not disclose the prices it charged clients.

White House communications operatives in previous administrations said many costs of presidential trips were paid for by whoever was deemed the official host of a trip - typically a federal agency, a city or a company. Trips deemed political are paid for by the parties.

"The total cost of a trip is ultimately shared across a wide spectrum of agencies and hosts," said Joshua King, who was director of production of presidential events in the Clinton administration. "To get to who really pays for presidential events would keep a team of accountants very busy."

The most elaborate - and criticized - White House event so far was Mr. Bush's speech aboard the Abraham Lincoln announcing the end of major combat in Iraq. White House officials say that a variety of people, including the president, came up with the idea, and that Mr. Sforza embedded himself on the carrier to make preparations days before Mr. Bush's landing in a flight suit and his early evening speech.

Media strategists noted afterward that Mr. Sforza and his aides had choreographed every aspect of the event, even down to the members of the Lincoln crew arrayed in coordinated shirt colors over Mr. Bush's right shoulder and the "Mission Accomplished" banner placed to perfectly capture the president and the celebratory two words in a single shot. The speech was specifically timed for what image makers call "magic hour light," which cast a golden glow on Mr. Bush.

"If you looked at the TV picture, you saw there was flattering light on his left cheek and slight shadowing on his right," Mr. King said. "It looked great."

The trip was attacked by Democrats as an expensive political stunt, but White House officials said that Democrats needed a better issue for taking on the president. A New York Times/CBS News nationwide poll conducted May 9-12 found that the White House may have been right: 59 percent of those polled said it was appropriate, and not an effort to make political gain, for Mr. Bush to dress in a flight suit and announce the end of combat operations on the aircraft carrier.

But even this White House makes mistakes. One of the more notable ones occurred in January, when Mr. Bush delivered a speech about his economic plan at a St. Louis trucking company. Volunteers for the White House covered "Made in China" stamps with white stickers on boxes arrayed on either side of the president. Behind Mr. Bush was a printed backdrop of faux boxes that read "Made in U.S.A.," the message the administration wanted to convey to the television audience.

The White House takes great pride in the backdrops, which are created by Mr. Sforza, and has gone so far as to help design them for universities where Mr. Bush travels to make commencement addresses. Last year, the White House helped design a large banner for Ohio State as part of the background for Mr. Bush; last week, the White House collaborated with the University of South Carolina to make Sforzian backdrops for a presidential commencement speech in the school's new Carolina Center.

"They really are good," said Russ McKinney, the school's director of public affairs, as he listened to the president.

Television camera crews, meanwhile, say they have rarely had such consistently attractive pictures to send back to editing rooms.

"They seem to approach an event site like it's a TV set," said Chris Carlson, an ABC cameraman who covers the White House. "They dress it up really nicely. It looks like a million bucks."

Even for standard-issue White House events, Mr. Bush's image makers watch every angle. Last week, when the president had a joint news conference with Prime Minister José Mariá Aznar of Spain, it was staged in the Grand Foyer of the White House, under grand marble columns, with the Blue Room and a huge cream-colored bouquet of flowers illuminated in the background. (Mr. Sforza and Mr. DeServi could be seen there conferring before the cameras began rolling.) The scene was lush and rich, filled with the beauty of the White House in real time.

"They understand they have to build a set, whether it's an aircraft carrier or the Rose Garden or the South Lawn," Mr. Deaver said. "They understand that putting depth into the picture makes the candidate or president look better."

Or as Mr. Deaver said he learned long ago with Mr. Reagan: "They understand that what's around the head is just as important as the head."

http://www.nytimes.com/2003/05/16/politics/16IMAG.html?ex=1054110450&ei=1&en=ec5fe7da8bd6a187
---------------------------------
2003 The New York Times Company

See also:  Bush as Top Gun: Deconstructing Visual Theatric Imagery









 


 

 



 

White House Pressroom Gets a Makeover

Video Wall, Other Technology Could
Inject Drama and Directly Appeal
To Public in Briefings
By JOHN D. MCKINNON
August 1, 2006; Page A4
Wall Street Journal

 

WASHINGTON -- For a decade, the daily White House news briefing has been televised. Now it is becoming television.

Earlier this year, Fox News talk show host Tony Snow was hired as press secretary. Next up: a renovation of the briefing room, likely with a video wall that could display everything from "flags waving in the breeze [to] detailed charts and graphs," according to a senior White House official working on the project. For TV viewers, the video feed could be the sole on-screen image, or could share the space with the speaker.

White House officials say they are weighing how -- and how often -- to use the video capability. But the new technology could help transform White House briefings -- midday exchanges with reporters in a utilitarian setting -- into more interesting viewing. Both the planned video capabilities and Mr. Snow's hiring appear to be part of a subtle but sweeping effort by administration officials to deliver their message directly to the public, particularly through video.

"It's simply a necessary response to a news environment where you have players in all quarters 24 hours a day," Mr. Snow says. "If you're in government ... your key challenge [is] to make sure you get your message out."

Even before the technical upgrade, the weekday White House briefing has gotten livelier and drawn more attention with Mr. Snow. For example, it's being excerpted more often on news shows, according to media observers. C-SPAN often carries the briefing, which usually runs between 30 minutes and an hour, in its entirety, though not always live. It's also available on various Web sites. The number of people watching on an ordinary day probably still measures in the thousands, according to former press secretaries.

The Bush administration has taken the practice of managing its official message to new levels -- for example, by providing packaged video stories to local TV news shows, as well as paying conservative columnists for positive coverage -- a practice the president since has criticized. On the campaign trail and in many public events, President Bush has used backdrops with vivid images or repeated slogans to reinforce the words of his speeches.

Some media observers say the moves to upgrade the White House briefing reflect a focus on minimizing or circumventing criticism of the Bush administration in the place where it has been most concentrated -- the dingy and often unruly press briefing room.

Earlier this year, White House Chief of Staff Josh Bolten said it might be a good idea to stop televising the briefing, a practice that began in the mid-1990s to feed the appetites of 24-hour news outlets. Mike McCurry, press secretary for President Bill Clinton who first allowed it, now regrets the decision, saying it became "a soap opera." But it would be near-impossible for any administration to turn back the clock now, he says.

The video capability the White House is considering for the press room is similar to that used at the Defense Department, recent political conventions and on TV news shows. Officials are struggling with costs and how to juggle the small space around the platform and podium at the front of the room. Work begins at the end of the week and likely will last until the spring. In the meantime, briefings and the White House press corps will move into temporary facilities across Pennsylvania Avenue.

Media experts say graphics and charts could reinforce the White House's message at briefings. A video wall also could diminish the role of reporters as questioners. For example, remote briefers might sometimes appear on home TV screens to talk past the reporters in the room, and address the public directly. That already happens with some video feeds, such as when a colonel in Ramadi, Iraq, led off a recent Pentagon briefing by saying, "I'm always happy for the opportunity to tell Americans what a great job their sons and daughters are doing for all Americans over here." Pentagon news briefings also frequently find their way onto cable TV.

"Putting a video wall in the White House allows any administration to shape almost any story much more directly," said Ralph Begleiter, a former CNN foreign-affairs reporter who now is a professor of communications at the University of Delaware. It's "an extension of the idea that the government wants to speak directly to the public with a voice that's very carefully crafted, without room for the analysis or critiques or amalgamations of fact that reporters routinely bring."

[New Look]

Ari Fleischer, White House press secretary during Mr. Bush's first term, said he toyed with the idea of using video graphics in the briefing room. Mr. Fleischer concluded the White House at the time lacked the technical capabilities.

Since Mr. Snow became press secretary, the briefing has become more visible as TV shows run excerpts, according to media watchers. The briefings also are spreading through clips and streaming video on the Web, but official viewership figures aren't available.

Conservatives despaired at the rough treatment that reporters sometimes gave to Mr. Snow's predecessor, Scott McClellan, during the briefing. These days, though, Mr. Snow, a skillful debater, is turning the heat more often on reporters.

On the Web, clusters of like-minded conservatives now cheer Mr. Snow's comebacks to combative reporters like Hearst columnist Helen Thomas -- at 85, the dean of the White House press corps. During an exchange over North Korea at the July 10 briefing, for example, Mr. Snow bluntly told Ms. Thomas that "you're wrong." At another briefing, Mr. Snow accused Ms. Thomas of "pestering the teacher" with interruptions. The gruff but grandmotherly Ms. Thomas later complained about the exchange during an appearance on Comedy Central's "Daily Show with Jon Stewart," prompting sympathy from Mr. Stewart. Ms. Thomas was promoting her new book.

Mr. Snow says the briefing has become faster-paced. "Coming from the business, I think it does make a difference. ... I want to have fun," he said.

Write to John D. McKinnon at john.mckinnon@wsj.com